The COMEX'S reply and my response
(Oct 31, 2001) Sincerely, Dear Mr. Viola and Mr. Collins:
I have received a response to my letter of Oct 8, 2001, from Mr. Thomas
LaSala, of your Compliance Department. I am disappointed that his letter
was completely unresponsive to my specific allegation that the price of
silver was manipulated in the aftermath of the World Trade Center tragedy,
by the uneconomic naked short sale of almost 200 million ounces net, by
a handful of insider dealers.
Just to be clear, it is not just the handful of dealer member firms
who are violating speculative position limit law, it is also the large
non-commercials on the long side, and the technical funds who trade both
the long and short side in amounts of contracts beyond the clear intent
of commodity law. Real producers and consumers have no influence on the
price of silver, due to the speculative excesses you allow. This is against
the law.
While Mr. LaSala wrote that he had "openly discussed" the issues with
the Commodity Futures Trading Commission in Washington, DC, neither your
exchange, nor the CFTC, appear willing to discuss the issues publicly.
This is shameful. You had an opportunity to clean house or explain publicly
why my allegations were wrong. Instead, you chose to deny the public a
full airing of the issues. Let me remind you that your exchange is licensed
by and operates only with the approval of the United States Congress.
They certainly did not intend that your exchange be a private club, nor
be above the law.
Ted Butler
|
|