|
Silver bulls everywhere should take a moment and nod an appreciation
of thanks for a great favor rendered towards Warren Buffett, the
fabled investment genius, for his recent foray into the silver market.
It is no small matter of historical record that his investment company,
Berkshire Hathaway, purchased a significant chunk of world silver
inventories (significant for the silver market, anyway), thereby
focusing attention on one of the world's oldest and most recognized
traded assets. The reason silver investors should be feeling a sense
of gratitude to Mr. Buffett is for a number of factors, some obvious,
others perhaps not so obvious. To my mind, his purchase is the defining
moment in what promises to be a radical departure from the depressed
pricing pattern that has characterized silver for the past fifteen
years.
While some might consider this trivial at first blush, the most
immediate obvious reason for silver bulls to give thanks to Mr.
Buffett is for the instant relief that his Feb 3 announcement granted
from the carefully orchestrated professional public relations campaign
of the shorts that was raging at that time. On that date, the corrupt,
but highly effective, months-long campaign (which included endless
press, threatened and actual phony lawsuits and self-serving appeals
to government and exchange officials for immediate investigations,
all alleging some mysterious conspiracy by the longs) died an ignoble
death. It is nothing short of frightening that such an obvious manipulative
ploy could have even existed in our current sophisticated age. Just
think of it - there was an incredibly strong undertow of belief
that a commodity that hadn't even reached its viable production
cost was somehow pushed artificially too high in price and that
urgent action had to be taken to stop the greedy perpetrators in
their tracks. Were it not for the very stature of Warren Buffett
and his announcement, we'll never know what the alternative outcome
might have been. I doubt the shorts' dirty tactics have been banished
forever, but in the meantime, we're not subject to such nonsense
on a daily basis. Thanks, Mr. Buffett.
The second, and more permanent obvious good deed that Warren Buffett
has bestowed on the silver bulls was the stamp of approval that
he gave to the "silver story". You know the story - years of deficit
between production and consumption, the price inelasticity of both
supply and demand, the resulting shocking drawdown of inventories
and the ultra depressed price. It's one thing for you or I to say
it, but for Warren Buffett to say it and back it up with hundreds
of millions of dollars of his own and his long time shareholders
is different. As the world's most successful investor, he has eschewed
fads and stuck to value, and tops it off by communicating with common
sense and keen business intelligence. He has simply and eloquently
stated his reasons for purchasing silver and they need no modification
nor interpretation. No other individual on the face of the earth
could have issued a stronger validation on silver's value than Warren
Buffett. For the confirmation that silver is a great buy strictly
on the fundamentals, thanks again.
A less obvious, but very special benefit that Mr. Buffett has given
to silver investors is the shortening of the time span until the
coming certain lift-off of the silver price. By removing a significant
chunk of silver that was destined for the black hole of the silver
deficit, he has markedly accelerated the time it will take to get
to the 'Moment of Truth". Since more silver is consumed than is
produced, existing inventories must supplement production to match
demand. There is absolutely no escaping this law of the physical
world. Any inventory removed from the equation temporarily by a
non- consuming investor, mathematically reduces the time it would
take until the point at which production alone, with no assist from
existing stocks, must satisfy demand. It is at this point, that
all the talk and whining and tricks of the paper shorts will end,
and only the truth of real physical material brought to market by
higher prices will balance the supply/demand equation - just like
what has happened to palladium. For bringing closer the silver moment
of truth, Warren Buffett gets another salute. Not only has he exposed
to all, one of the greatest investment opportunities of a lifetime,
he has axiomatically hastened its resolution.
But I have saved for last the most important, albeit least obvious
contribution that Warren Buffett has made to the silver bulls. By
his actions and statements, Mr. Buffett has proved to all the folly
of the precious metal loan experiment. He has proven, beyond any
semblance of a doubt, that the silver (and by extension, other precious
metals) market has been manipulated to a criminally absurd depressed
price by metal loans and paper short derivatives. This is something
you're going to have to think about, but not too abstractly, so
please try to keep an open mind. First, just the facts. Then if
you'll allow me, a conjectural look into Warren Buffett's mind.
Almost twenty years ago, an aggressive speculator, far from the
inner circles of the financial elite establishment, plowed headlong
into the silver market. He knew the real fundamentals and the deficit
and the inelasticities in the supply/demand equation. He knew what
a relatively small purchase would do to the price. The effect on
the price of silver that Bunker Hunt wrought is the stuff of legend.
In roughly a one year period of time, the price climbed ten fold,
from 5 to 50, only to crash and burn as the rules were changed and
the margin calls rolled in. While the popular historical version
of the event painted Hunt with the unkind brush of unwarranted greed
and brashness, serious investors everywhere took note of the amount
that Hunt bought and the resultant effect on the price of silver.
The formula was real simple - 100 million ounces removed from the
market equaled a ten fold rise in price. The only problem was that
the government regulators and institutional shorts were aware of
the formula and were prepared for the next contender. The threat
of becoming the next Bunker Hunt was enough to frighten off all
comers for almost twenty years. It would take a contender of epic
proportions to dare the wrath of the silver shorts and their government
lap dogs and challenge the status quo of an artificially depressed
price.
It would take a Warren Buffett.
But some things are different from twenty years ago in the silver
market. For one thing the fundamentals are much more bullish. Years
of persistent deficits have left existing inventories at an all
time low (this for a commodity with a trading history measured in
the hundreds of years). For another thing, the age old economic
interplay between price and supply and demand that is the cornerstone
of the capitalistic system has been replaced in the precious metals
by leasing and the new substitute for price - the lease rate. But
one thing has remained as it was in Bunker Hunt's silver world,
the formula that taking 100 million ounces from silver inventories
would increase the price ten fold. However, since the real silver
market is in a much, much tighter fundamental position now than
it was twenty years ago, a 100 million ounce purchase today would
have a much more dramatic impact on the price of silver - say, a
50 fold increase in price, rather than the ten times increase attributed
to Hunt. And that is exactly what happened to the price of silver
when Warren Buffett bought his stake, it went up in price 50 fold.
Let me repeat that - the price of silver jumped 50 times in value
as Mr. Buffett effected his purchase.
You may think what I'm saying is
crazy, but I ask you to think this through. The lending of silver
and gold and precious metals is the driving force today in the markets.
It is what sets the price at the margin. The lease rate is more
important than the nominal price, because it is the price that moves
the real material at last resort. Metal loans are stupid, immoral,
fraudulent, manipulative and probably criminal (because they can
never be repaid) - but they are as real as rain in their effect
on the markets. Leasing and the lease rates control the markets
in precious metals completely. For proof, look at what happened
to the two prices of silver as a result of Berkshire Hathaway's
purchase. From July 25 to the date of the announcement, the nominal
price of silver increased maybe 40 per cent. The lease price, AKA
the real price, jumped 50 times or 5000 per cent, from one and a
half per cent to seventy five per cent. Also, Warren Buffett was
only able to secure the quantity of silver he did, because of the
very existence of metal leasing. No one would be stupid enough to
relinquish such a quantity of silver at such a ridiculous nominal
price, if he weren't blinded by confusion of the apparent (false)
logic of metal loans. The deception is based on the premise that
the metal loaned will somehow be repaid someday. In the ongoing
deficit consumption pattern that exists, repayment is unequivocally
impossible. Because metal leasing is firmly entrenched as an
establishment tool, nobody dares question it. If metal leasing had
been prevalent in Bunker Hunt's time, he would probably be referred
to today as Senator Hunt.
So what's the problem? Or am I just
being an unnecessarily harsh critic of precious metal loans? After
all, on the surface things don't appear too alarming. Mr. Buffett
was able to purchase an unbelievably large percentage of world silver
stocks with very little disruption to the nominal price. Certainly
lesser quantities are accommodated daily. The world of precious
metals seems to be cruising along splendidly, with only a few waves
here and there. The problem lies beneath the surface, just out of
sight. The market, due to leasing, is rotten to the core. A little
over a year ago, I wrote to the Treasury and the Fed about the fraudulent
and manipulative nature of metal loans. They wrote back, basically,
that all was well. At that time, lease rates on all the precious
metals were under one or two per cent per annum. In the span of
one year, for the first time ever, palladium lease rates have exceeded
300% on one occasion, and 200% on another. Platinum lease rates
have exceeded 80%, and silver lease rates 75%. All three markets
have undergone unilateral extensions of delivery terms for the first
time in decades. A less genteel soul would say that these markets
had defaulted. If you think default is too strong a word, compare
it to the rhetoric of the shorts in silver just prior to the Berkshire
Hathaway announcement. In any event, what do you think? Does this
not suggest that something is wrong in the precious metals world?
The problem is that the lease rate
has supplanted the nominal price of the metal in the three legged
stool that is the price/supply/demand equation. The lease rate has
become the fulcrum that lifts or lowers supply and demand and not
the actual price of the metal. It is an abomination and a manipulation
of the highest order. Perhaps, just perhaps this perversion of the
free market might be overlooked if there were any chance whatsoever
that the metal loans were really loans and could somehow be repaid.
But that concept is beyond ridiculous. There is absolutely, positively
no way metal loans can be repaid (with real metal) ever, ever, ever.
How could the market withdraw metal to repay past obligations when
it can't even cover current obligations (the ongoing deficits)?
Rest assured that one day the lenders and borrowers will wake up
and be jolted by the recognition of default. How could anyone attempt
to justify an industrial corporation securing supplies for consumption
by borrowing silver? Don't you think Warren Buffett saw this? Do
you think he would place hundreds of millions of dollars in an unconventional
market on a whim? Do you think he paid cash on the barrel head and
chose to store in London on a lark? Don't you think he can see the
day when the metal loan fiasco blows up, but in the meantime it
is offering cash buyers the deal of a lifetime?
This is not to suggest that Warren
Buffett has in anyway been a borrower or lender in the silver market,
he's much too smart for that. He knew that leasing and the paper
short derivatives created a low price for a legitimate buyer. He
saw the silver situation for what it was and seized the moment.
He was not intimidated by history or by the certain treachery of
the manipulative shorts. An ordinary man would stand no chance of
success as a pioneer in this game. Mr. Buffett has cleared the path.
The conjecture I have about the man is as follows. His long time
partner, Charlie Munger, remarked at the Berkshire Hathaway annual
meeting how Mr. Buffett followed the silver market for 30 years
before taking a position starting last July 25. I think I know what
would cause such a man as Mr. Buffett to look at something so long
before suddenly taking a strong position. It wasn't just patience.
I think he was looking at and studying the silver market, and the
deficits, and the low price, and kept thinking that he must be seeing
something wrong, or overlooking some obvious factor that would explain
the low price in spite of the apparent shortage. His common sense
told him that something had to be wrong with his analysis, because
you couldn't have a prolonged shortage and continued depressed prices.
Then, last summer, he became aware of metal leasing and its manipulative
effect on the markets. He understood at once that it was the uneconomic
sale of metal under the terms of a never to be repaid loan that
explained why silver could be priced so low in a shortage. He saw
right through the sham lease transactions and acted accordingly.
Maybe someday he'll verify my conjecture. Even if he doesn't, he'll
still have my gratitude.
What Warren Buffett has done, more
than anything else, is alert anyone intelligent enough to listen
about a world class investment opportunity. I can just about hear
him describing silver as an ongoing business or stock. "Here is
low price venture that is guaranteed never to go bankrupt. It will
always have a ready liquidation value. I can own it in size. It
is 98% below its inflation adjusted high price of twenty years ago.
I never have to worry about bad management taking over. Shares outstanding
are being reduced by twenty per cent a year. It requires no time,
no maintenance and little ongoing expense. It is like no other asset
and is a prudent diversification. It is impervious to currency and
political upheaval. It has stood the test of time for utility and
desirability. It is known and wanted by every inhabitant on the
earth. It is out of favor currently with the establishment. It has
the largest naked short position ever known in history. The risk/reward
ratio is so good it's scary. Forget compliant, it's Y2K enhanced.
And, although it probably shouldn't matter at my age, it is the
sexiest investment I own."
Maybe somebody can come up with a
better investment than the current best bet of the world's best
investor. Even so, my hat's off to Warren Buffett, and if you're
a silver bull, yours should be too.
Ted Butler
16 May 1998
|